GitnessvsRoborock Local Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gitness | Roborock Local Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #3 of 5 in Smart Home |
| GitHub stars | 38 761 | 1 206 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +327 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | v1.2.1 · 8 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Gitness scores 80/100 against 54/100 for Roborock Local Server, so it is the safer default.
Roborock Local Server ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gitness.
If you want the quickest setup, Gitness is easier to run; Roborock Local Server needs more configuration.
Gitness is growing faster right now (+327 stars in 30 days).
Gitness details →Roborock Local Server details →