Gitnessvshass-configurator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gitness | hass-configurator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 38 761 | 339 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +327 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Gitness scores 80/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
Gitness ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
If you want the quickest setup, Gitness is easier to run; hass-configurator needs more configuration.
Gitness is growing faster right now (+327 stars in 30 days).
Gitness details →hass-configurator details →