github-actions-cache-servervsGitness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| github-actions-cache-server | Gitness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #22 of 28 in CI/CD | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 459 | 38 745 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +318 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 6 |
| Latest release | v10.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Gitness scores 80/100 against 49/100 for github-actions-cache-server, so it is the safer default.
github-actions-cache-server ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gitness.
If you want the quickest setup, Gitness is easier to run; github-actions-cache-server needs more configuration.
Gitness is growing faster right now (+318 stars in 30 days).
github-actions-cache-server details →Gitness details →