gitbucketvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| gitbucket | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 14 in Code Hosting | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 9 419 | 8 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +15 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 1 |
| Latest release | 4.48.0 · 20 Sept 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Scala | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
gitbucket scores 68/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
gitbucket ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
gitbucket details →Workout.cool details →