ghstatsvsMetabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ghstats | Metabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #18 of 27 in Analytics | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 190 | 49 896 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +498 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 30 |
| Latest release | v0.10.0 · 25 Aug 2026 | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Clojure |
Which one should you pick?
Metabase scores 83/100 against 45/100 for ghstats, so it is the safer default.
Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for ghstats.
If you want the quickest setup, ghstats is easier to run; Metabase needs more configuration.
Metabase is growing faster right now (+498 stars in 30 days).
ghstats details →Metabase details →
Swap a project
Keep ghstats, compare it with
Keep Metabase, compare it with