Ghostfoliovsmetamcp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ghostfolio | metamcp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 62 in Personal Finance | #10 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 9 599 | 2 734 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +259 | +48 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 104 | 3 |
| Latest release | 3.94.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Ghostfolio scores 75/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.
Ghostfolio ships more often: 104 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.
Ghostfolio is growing faster right now (+259 stars in 30 days).
Ghostfolio details →metamcp details →
Swap a project
Keep Ghostfolio, compare it with
Keep metamcp, compare it with