GhostfoliovsMedusaJs
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ghostfolio | MedusaJs | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 62 in Personal Finance | #1 of 27 in E-commerce |
| GitHub stars | 9 599 | 36 988 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +259 | +548 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 104 | 18 |
| Latest release | 3.94.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 75/100 for Ghostfolio, so it is the safer default.
Ghostfolio ships more often: 104 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MedusaJs.
If you want the quickest setup, Ghostfolio is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.
MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+548 stars in 30 days).
Ghostfolio details →MedusaJs details →
Swap a project
Keep Ghostfolio, compare it with
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with