ghostboardvsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ghostboard | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 342 | 93 190 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +57 916 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 35 |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | HTML | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 48/100 for ghostboard, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ghostboard.
If you want the quickest setup, ghostboard is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 916 stars in 30 days).
ghostboard details →OmniVoice-Studio details →