geopulsevsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| geopulse | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 466 | 89 759 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 | +2 420 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 17 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 64/100 for geopulse, so it is the safer default.
geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, geopulse is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 420 stars in 30 days).
geopulse details →World Monitor details →