geopulsevsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| geopulse | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 1 466 | 53 717 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 | +322 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 64/100 for geopulse, so it is the safer default.
geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for WindowsinDocker.
If you want the quickest setup, geopulse is easier to run; WindowsinDocker needs more configuration.
WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+322 stars in 30 days).
geopulse details →WindowsinDocker details →