geopulsevsQGIS Web Client
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| geopulse | QGIS Web Client | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 1 466 | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
geopulse scores 64/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS Web Client.
If you want the quickest setup, geopulse is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.
geopulse is growing faster right now (+54 stars in 30 days).
geopulse details →QGIS Web Client details →