fuglerammevsShinobi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| fugleramme | Shinobi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #19 of 104 in Home Automation | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 3 952 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.29.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | — |
Which one should you pick?
Shinobi scores 66/100 against 63/100 for fugleramme, so it is the safer default.
fugleramme ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shinobi.
If you want the quickest setup, fugleramme is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.
fugleramme details →Shinobi details →
Swap a project
Keep fugleramme, compare it with
Keep Shinobi, compare it with