fuglerammevsgo2rtc
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| fugleramme | go2rtc | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #19 of 104 in Home Automation | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 3 952 | 14 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +276 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.29.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
go2rtc scores 74/100 against 63/100 for fugleramme, so it is the safer default.
fugleramme ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.
If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; fugleramme needs more configuration.
go2rtc is growing faster right now (+276 stars in 30 days).
fugleramme details →go2rtc details →
Swap a project
Keep fugleramme, compare it with
Keep go2rtc, compare it with