FSCrawlervsPaddleOCR Local
Two self-hosted Document Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| FSCrawler | PaddleOCR Local | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #46 of 46 in Document Management | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 455 | 139 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 0 |
| Latest release | fscrawler-3.0 · 26 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | — | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR Local scores 44/100 against 27/100 for FSCrawler, so it is the safer default.
FSCrawler ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for PaddleOCR Local.
PaddleOCR Local is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
FSCrawler details →PaddleOCR Local details →All Document Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep FSCrawler, compare it with
Keep PaddleOCR Local, compare it with