FossFLOWvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| FossFLOW | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 12 in Diagramming | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 226 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.0.5 · 7 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
WBO scores 61/100 against 47/100 for FossFLOW, so it is the safer default.
FossFLOW ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.
WBO is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).
FossFLOW details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep FossFLOW, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with