FossFLOWvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| FossFLOW | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 12 in Diagramming | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 226 | 114 252 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 543 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.0.5 · 7 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 47/100 for FossFLOW, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for FossFLOW.
If you want the quickest setup, FossFLOW is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 543 stars in 30 days).
FossFLOW details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep FossFLOW, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with