flowise-aivsLocalAGI
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| flowise-ai | LocalAGI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #22 of 209 in AI Agents | #68 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 55 561 | 2 013 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 5 |
| Latest release | flowise@3.1.4 · 29 Jul 2026 | v2.9.0 · 8 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
flowise-ai scores 74/100 against 57/100 for LocalAGI, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, flowise-ai is easier to run; LocalAGI needs more configuration.
flowise-ai is growing faster right now (+72 stars in 30 days).
flowise-ai is archived, so it won't get fixes. Prefer the other one for anything long-lived.
Key differences
- License: flowise-ai is Apache-2.0, LocalAGI is MIT.
- Language: flowise-ai is written mainly in Typescript, LocalAGI in Go.
- Platforms only flowise-ai lists: Docker, Kubernetes, Node.js.
- Platforms only LocalAGI lists: Pre-built Binaries.
- Features only flowise-ai lists: Broad LLM/vector-store support, Custom MCP tool support, Execution traces and metrics, Horizontal scaling with queue and 5 more.
- Features only LocalAGI lists: Agent observability, Custom actions in Go, Local inference on CPU/GPU, Long-term Memory and 10 more.
- Both offer: REST API.
flowise-ai details →LocalAGI details →All AI Agents projects →