flowctlvsOllama
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| flowctl | Ollama | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 95/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 343 | 185 124 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 576 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 50 |
| Latest release | v0.15.0 · 7 Sept 2026 | v0.40.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Ollama scores 95/100 against 47/100 for flowctl, so it is the safer default.
Ollama ships more often: 50 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for flowctl.
If you want the quickest setup, Ollama is easier to run; flowctl needs more configuration.
Ollama is growing faster right now (+3 576 stars in 30 days).
flowctl details →Ollama details →
Swap a project
Keep flowctl, compare it with
Keep Ollama, compare it with