flowctlvsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| flowctl | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 343 | 132 646 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 289 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 1457 |
| Latest release | v0.15.0 · 7 Sept 2026 | b11968 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 47/100 for flowctl, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1457 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for flowctl.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 289 stars in 30 days).
flowctl details →llama.cpp details →
Swap a project
Keep flowctl, compare it with
Keep llama.cpp, compare it with