flowbakervsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| flowbaker | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #25 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 205 | 132 674 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 317 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1461 |
| Latest release | — | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 42/100 for flowbaker, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1461 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for flowbaker.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 317 stars in 30 days).
flowbaker details →llama.cpp details →
Swap a project
Keep flowbaker, compare it with
Keep llama.cpp, compare it with