FloodvsSonarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Flood | Sonarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in Torrent | #1 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 860 | 17 476 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | +979 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 34 |
| Latest release | v4.16.3 · 17 Oct 2026 | v5.0.0.2838 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
Sonarr scores 81/100 against 65/100 for Flood, so it is the safer default.
Sonarr ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Flood.
If you want the quickest setup, Flood is easier to run; Sonarr needs more configuration.
Sonarr is growing faster right now (+979 stars in 30 days).
Flood details →Sonarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Flood, compare it with
Keep Sonarr, compare it with