ruTorrentvsSonarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ruTorrent | Sonarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Bittorrent | #1 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 188 | 17 475 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +978 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 34 |
| Latest release | v5.3.19 · 24 Oct 2026 | v5.0.0.2838 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | C |
Which one should you pick?
Sonarr scores 81/100 against 62/100 for ruTorrent, so it is the safer default.
Sonarr ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for ruTorrent.
If you want the quickest setup, Sonarr is easier to run; ruTorrent needs more configuration.
Sonarr is growing faster right now (+978 stars in 30 days).
ruTorrent details →Sonarr details →
Swap a project
Keep ruTorrent, compare it with
Keep Sonarr, compare it with