Flagsmithvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Flagsmith | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Feature Flags | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 629 | 114 258 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +61 | +3 549 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 65 | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.287.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 73/100 for Flagsmith, so it is the safer default.
Flagsmith ships more often: 65 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, Flagsmith is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 549 stars in 30 days).
Flagsmith details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep Flagsmith, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with