Flagsmithvsilla-builder
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Flagsmith | illa-builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Feature Flags | #3 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 6 630 | 12 335 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +61 | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 68 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.288.2 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Flagsmith scores 73/100 against 67/100 for illa-builder, so it is the safer default.
Flagsmith ships more often: 68 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.
If you want the quickest setup, Flagsmith is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.
Flagsmith is growing faster right now (+61 stars in 30 days).
Flagsmith details →illa-builder details →
Swap a project
Keep Flagsmith, compare it with
Keep illa-builder, compare it with