Fish SpeechvsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 33 451 | 8 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +128 | +198 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 33 |
| Latest release | — | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Warpgate scores 75/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.
Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech details →Warpgate details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Warpgate, compare it with