Fish SpeechvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 33 461 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with