Fish SpeechvsUmlautAdaptarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | UmlautAdaptarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #119 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 461 | 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.6 · 5 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 40/100 for UmlautAdaptarr, so it is the safer default.
UmlautAdaptarr ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, UmlautAdaptarr is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →UmlautAdaptarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep UmlautAdaptarr, compare it with