Fish SpeechvsTorollo
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Torollo | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #15 of 30 in Education |
| GitHub stars | 33 457 | 449 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v1.2.5 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 47/100 for Torollo, so it is the safer default.
Torollo ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Torollo is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →Torollo details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Torollo, compare it with