Fish SpeechvsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 33 457 | 11 122 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
Fish Speech details →SonarQube details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep SonarQube, compare it with