Fish SpeechvsQGIS Web Client
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | QGIS Web Client | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 33 462 | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
QGIS Web Client ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →QGIS Web Client details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep QGIS Web Client, compare it with