Fish SpeechvsProxMenux
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | ProxMenux | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 15 in Backup Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 451 | 3 241 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +128 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | v1.2.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 62/100 for ProxMenux, so it is the safer default.
ProxMenux ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, ProxMenux is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+128 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →ProxMenux details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep ProxMenux, compare it with