Fish SpeechvsOctoprint
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Octoprint | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 33 475 | 9 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +152 | +61 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech and Octoprint score the same (73/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+152 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →Octoprint details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Octoprint, compare it with