Fish SpeechvsNewtArr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | NewtArr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #111 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 457 | 195 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.0 · 24 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 43/100 for NewtArr, so it is the safer default.
NewtArr ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, NewtArr is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →NewtArr details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep NewtArr, compare it with