Fish SpeechvsNetMap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | NetMap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #31 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 33 464 | 154 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +141 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 |
| Latest release | — | v1.7.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 47/100 for NetMap, so it is the safer default.
NetMap ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, NetMap is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+141 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →NetMap details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep NetMap, compare it with