Fish Speechvsmitmproxy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | mitmproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 33 473 | 46 477 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +150 | +1 333 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.
mitmproxy ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, mitmproxy is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 333 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →mitmproxy details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep mitmproxy, compare it with