Fish SpeechvsMediary Scout
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Mediary Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #28 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 454 | 1 594 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +131 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v2026.10.29 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | 0BSD |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 59/100 for Mediary Scout, so it is the safer default.
Mediary Scout ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Mediary Scout is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →Mediary Scout details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Mediary Scout, compare it with