Mediary ScoutvsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mediary Scout | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #28 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 1 594 | 92 975 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +58 034 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 35 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.29 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | 0BSD | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 59/100 for Mediary Scout, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Mediary Scout.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 034 stars in 30 days).
Mediary Scout details →OmniVoice-Studio details →