Fish Speechvsmedia-journal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | media-journal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #97 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 469 | 138 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +146 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 |
| Latest release | — | v1.31.3 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 45/100 for media-journal, so it is the safer default.
media-journal ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, media-journal is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+146 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →media-journal details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep media-journal, compare it with