Fish Speechvsmagic-frame
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | magic-frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #58 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 33 475 | 511 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +152 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 22 |
| Latest release | — | v1.5.11 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.
magic-frame ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, magic-frame is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+152 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →magic-frame details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep magic-frame, compare it with