magic-framevsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| magic-frame | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 511 | 93 190 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +57 916 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 35 |
| Latest release | v1.5.10 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for magic-frame.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 916 stars in 30 days).
magic-frame details →OmniVoice-Studio details →
Swap a project
Keep magic-frame, compare it with
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with