Fish SpeechvsLanLens
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | LanLens | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 33 482 | 147 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +159 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 |
| Latest release | — | v1.6.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 45/100 for LanLens, so it is the safer default.
LanLens ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, LanLens is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+159 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →LanLens details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep LanLens, compare it with