Fish SpeechvsLAN-Orangutan
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | LAN-Orangutan | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 33 473 | 1 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +150 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 58/100 for LAN-Orangutan, so it is the safer default.
LAN-Orangutan ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, LAN-Orangutan is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+150 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →LAN-Orangutan details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep LAN-Orangutan, compare it with