Fish SpeechvsKestra
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Kestra | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 33 462 | 30 057 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | +1 722 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 59 |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Kestra scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.
Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Kestra is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 722 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →Kestra details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Kestra, compare it with