Fish SpeechvsJoplin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Joplin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 33 461 | 56 920 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 | +440 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 |
| Latest release | — | v3.7.22 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Joplin scores 83/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.
Joplin ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Joplin is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Joplin is growing faster right now (+440 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →Joplin details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Joplin, compare it with