Fish SpeechvsInvidious
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Invidious | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 33 461 | 25 801 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 | +1 030 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | v2.20261022.0 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Crystal |
Which one should you pick?
Invidious scores 80/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.
Invidious ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Invidious is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Invidious is growing faster right now (+1 030 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →Invidious details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Invidious, compare it with