Fish Speechvshoundarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | houndarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #54 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 461 | 304 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 |
| Latest release | — | v1.13.3 · 19 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 53/100 for houndarr, so it is the safer default.
houndarr ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, houndarr is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →houndarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep houndarr, compare it with