Fish Speechvshass-configurator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | hass-configurator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 33 475 | 339 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +152 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
hass-configurator ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, hass-configurator is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+152 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →hass-configurator details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with