Firefly IIIvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Firefly III | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 62 in Personal Finance | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 25 024 | 47 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +300 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 10 |
| Latest release | develop-20261028.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Firefly III scores 82/100 against 76/100 for Text Generation WebUI, so it is the safer default.
Firefly III ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Firefly III needs more configuration.
Firefly III is growing faster right now (+300 stars in 30 days).
Firefly III details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep Firefly III, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with