firecrawlvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| firecrawl | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 196 406 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 513 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 9 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
firecrawl scores 91/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 513 stars in 30 days).
firecrawl details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep firecrawl, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with