firecrawlvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| firecrawl | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 196 430 | 8 068 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 537 | +160 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
firecrawl scores 91/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for firecrawl.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.
firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 537 stars in 30 days).
firecrawl details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep firecrawl, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with